Quick links: my home page • my blog • Choosing My Confessions
Discomfort zone
By Nicholas Laughlin
First
published in Modern Painters, June
2006
Uncomfortable,
Richard Fung’s documentary about the Trinidadian artist Christopher
Cozier, opens with its subject in his studio, examining a tall stool
like the ones he sat on at school thirty years ago. “This is what I
know, this is what I understand, and in a lot of my work I try to deal
with that . . . how to contend with the very thing that was once
uncomfortable and now means something familiar . . . I have weird
obsessions with these things.”
A sequence of shots shows a selection of “these things”: a megaphone, a
crutch, a small wrought iron table of a type popular in 1960s Trinidad.
These are all objects converted into ironic symbols in Cozier’s
multimedia work, aimed at finding a vocabulary to describe the
experience of living in a small post-colonial Caribbean island that has
never fit the white-sand-and-palm-trees stereotype; as Cozier puts it
later in the documentary, “a world with two coups, murders,
kidnappings, wrought iron, queen shows.”
Fung helpfully provides titles with crime statistics and information
about Trinidad and Tobago’s beauty queens. Another title baldly
summarises the country’s art scene: “Only a handful of Trinidadians
work in contemporary art.” Of this handful, Cozier has become a sort of
representative figure — prolific, provocative, articulate, struggling
to find an audience at home even as his work travels further abroad.
At Cozier’s house, surrounded by the detritus of his young family,
we’re discussing the documentary — specifically, its title. “There’s an
element of discomfort in that,” Cozier says, only half punning. Partly
because in Trinidad the word “comfortable” suggests financial success.
Born in 1959, Cozier left Trinidad in 1983 for art school in the US. At
the end of 1988, he and his wife Irénée Shaw — also an
artist — returned to Trinidad with their first child. The country’s
economy was in tatters and the coalition government was falling apart.
“People seemed to look to art for some kind of new thought,” Cozier
remembers, “And were extremely curious about what younger people had to
say.”
Trinidadian art since the 1950s had been dominated by an “Independence
generation” (Trinidad and Tobago became an independent state in 1962)
of men and women who believed their duty was scripting a cultural
narrative to support the assertion of nationhood. Part of that
aspiration was an engagement with Modernism. Painting was the preferred
form, and they dealt in images intended to define an affirming version
of “Caribbeanness”: tropical landscapes, references to ancestral
cultures, elements of the “folk.” But by the end of the 60s,
Independence euphoria had succumbed to the realities of a society still
hung up on the anxieties and prejudices of colonialism. The leading
artists of the time retreated into guardianship of their legacies — “a
kind of ‘estate police’ work,” Cozier puts it.
Twenty years later, the time seemed ripe to challenge the status quo.
Young artists returned from studying abroad, flushed with the
confidence of ambition, and set about producing work that asked awkward
questions. Cozier himself made pioneering performance and installation
works which he showed alongside his drawings. They created small
sensations, and the art establishment reacted swiftly. A prominent
artist known for his watercolour landscapes left a note pinned to the
wall at one of Cozier’s shows: “SOME DIRECT ADVICE . . . you will never
be a fine artist. Stick to graphics.” Nonetheless, that show opened the
door to Cozier’s participation in the 1994 Havana Biennal.
Support came from one Port of Spain gallery, and a German couple living
in Trinidad bought work by young artists and helped produce a catalogue
for Cozier, Shaw, and two others, Steve Ouditt and Edward Bowen (in
consequence, these four came to be seen as a “group,” despite obvious
differences in ideas and methods). And Cozier began to look outside the
island for an audience. By the late 1990s, Trinidad and Tobago’s
economy was booming again — the country has substantial oil and natural
gas deposits — and local collectors abandoned their flirtation with the
contemporary, snapping up realist paintings of “fish, trees, bird,
boat, house, and landscape,” as Cozier says in Uncomfortable, as he flees an
onslaught of such objects in a Port of Spain gallery.
His work, he began to feel, was strangely “invisible,” so alien to
local audiences’ notions of themselves and their world that it did not
register, couldn’t be seen. And by now, he was showing more often
abroad than at home. The title of a 1998 show in Port of Spain, Migrate or Medal/Meddle, seemed to
summarise his options. Except showing abroad raised a fresh dilemma.
“At home, I have one kind of conversation, because everybody here is
relatively within a similar narrative,” Cozier says in Uncomfortable’s closing scene.
“Abroad, there are other kinds of dynamics . . . Do I have a history
that can register in a global conversation or not?” The India-born,
Jamaica-resident critic Annie Paul suggests that artists like Cozier
“suffer a double illegitimacy when they go abroad, because metropolitan
critics see their artistic practice as too elevated above or irrelevant
to the realities of third-world countries. What, conceptual art in the
periphery?”
“I see my work as not about pronouncements, but about conversations,”
Cozier says — “conversation” is one of his favourite words. It’s also
the aim of his critical writing, which led to his joining the
collective of Small Axe, a
Caribbean journal of social, cultural, and political criticism launched
in 1997 (and invited to participate in Documenta 12). And the
conversations that artists like Cozier started in the early 90s created
the momentum for Caribbean Contemporary Arts, or CCA7, an arts centre
on the outskirts of Port of Spain that hosts artists from abroad, and
where Peter Doig and Chris Ofili now have studios. (Even as the
presence of these art-world stars draws the international spotlight
closer, Trinidadian artists continue to grapple with the relevance of
their location.)
Cross-national conversations also provide vital stimulus. Cozier’s work
with Fung — born in Trinidad, resident in Canada since 1973 — is an apt
example. They met after Fung saw Cozier’s 2001 show Intersection +. He began taping
interviews with Cozier, and they collaborated on a video installation, The Unbearable State of Sliced Bread
(2004), shown by curator Andrea Fatona at the A-Space Gallery in
Toronto. Then Fung decided to turn his footage into a documentary, even
though, as he puts it, “I don’t like documentaries about artists. I
find the mediating lens puts me at a distance from the artwork.”
Uncomfortable uses several
strategies to close that distance. It zooms in on the artworks
themselves, then cuts away to Cozier analysing the real-world objects —
furniture, building materials, a particular kind of palm tree, the
podiums where athletes receive their medals — that are the etymological
roots of his private vocabulary. Cozier recreates Art and Nation (Notes), Learn from Day #1
(1998), the piece that first caught Fung’s attention, a blackboard
whose chalk inscription declares an “Us” and a “Them”, and pokes fun at
the nationalist agendas communicated through classroom rote-learning.
And just as Cozier’s work circles obsessively over a set of intractable
problems and puzzling symbols, Fung’s unresolved narrative ends where
it starts; he constructs sequences from material recorded sometimes
years apart, and leaves in obvious discontinuities.
Though Uncomfortable will air
on Canadian television later this year, there are currently no plans to
screen it in Trinidad. And after a couple of years of travelling and
showing abroad, Cozier has hunkered down and returned, as he always
does, to drawing: to a new series with dark, sinister tones. “I’m
trying to get rid of the rhetorical, get rid of all the familiar
symbolism. I’m extending and expanding the vocabulary.” The images are
sometimes nightmarish, often sardonic: a man in a fenced enclosure
gobbling human flesh; a dog that marks the corners of its territory —
the page — with yellow splashes; flocks of hummingbirds performing
suspicious tasks; a slice of cake topped with an obscenely round, red
cherry.
“Drawing is my thought process,” Cozier says. “It’s about
investigation, speculation.” Drawing is also a deliberate choice, the
ephemerality of “notes on little pieces of paper” a response to the
monumentality of painting on canvas. “Note-taking to me is conceptually
very important. It has to do with notions of being sure and unsure.”
Drawing becomes a performative act: “When I make those marks, there’s a
sense of being alive.”
Ornate script spirals and fills empty spaces on the pages. Heavy sepia
washes, nervous pen-strokes, rubber-stamped shapes that flirt with
thoughtless replication, and the sense of a narrative in fragments.
“I’m using the vocabulary and trying to find my way through it,” Cozier
says. Looking at the drawings, I’m tempted to shuffle them like cards,
see if I can make them tell a story. I can’t, at least not yet.
It makes me a feel a little bit uncomfortable. +